Group: http://groups.google.com/group/sitedesign/topics
- date of birth on reg form [3 Updates]
- CMS for entire site? [4 Updates]
- Binaek Sarkar <binaek89@gmail.com> Oct 21 01:59PM +0530
<select name="year" *id="year"*>
<option value="1910">1910</option>
<!--to current year-->
<option value="2008">2008</option>
</select>
<select name="month" *id="month"*>
<option value="1">January</option>
<option value="2">February</option>
<option value="3">March</option>
<!--etc...-->
</select>
<select name="days" *id="days"*>
<option value="1">1</option>
<option value="2">2</option>
<option value="3">3</option>
<!--etc...-->
</select>
*<input type="hidden" value = "" name = "dob" id="dob"/>*
In JQuery write:
*$('form id').submit(function(){*
* var day = $('#days').val();*
* var month = $('#month').val();*
* var year = $('#year').val();*
* *
* var dob = day + "/" + month + "/" + year;*
*
*
* $('#dob").val(dob);*
*});
*
In your server-side code, extract the value of *dob* and save it.
/************************************************************************/
But none the less, handling it with a calendar is much more preferred.
JQueryUI library has a readymade calendar API. Its very versatile and
flexible and meets most of the needs.
The reference URL is:http://jqueryui.com/demos/datepicker/
Regards
Binaek Sarkar
Foundation
http://www.foundation.net.in/
- Joe Kelly <jkelly.developer@gmail.com> Oct 21 08:08AM -0700
Perfect, sorry I should have provided an example. Good call on the submit
event.
- ernest okojie <nestkojex@gmail.com> Oct 21 10:51PM +0100
Thank you to you all. In fact I now have Ą̸̸̸ whole range of options
τ̅☺ choose from.
--
Best Regards
www.kojexconsult.com
- Jud <judsonvaughn@gmail.com> Oct 20 09:17PM -0700
All,
I definitely don't have my mind made up. Just strongly opinionated.
Your arguments are convincing. I prefer to work in raw code without
the "rubber gloves" of helper web-based editors, but I can't argue
with the speed of templating.
I got out of this work for awhile. I guess I need to reconsider.
Jud
- Joni Mueller <joni@jonimueller.com> Oct 20 11:50PM -0500
Well, Jud, it's not just about web developer/designer convenience, it's also about what's best for the client. And most clients do best on sites that they can maintain themselves. Notice I said "most." And I am a firm believer in making sure the client is in control, at least as much as they want to be.
And as far as WYSIWYG editors, I don't use them. I use my own tools to work, offline, in the template code, HTML and CSS (EditPlus and TopStyle Pro should you wonder). But it IS nice to be able to hop onto the site and make a tweak here and there when necessary without those tools. The web based editors are more for the clients' convenience I should imagine.
Joni Mueller
Pixelita Designs
http://www.pixelita.com
________________________________________
From: sitedesign@googlegroups.com [sitedesign@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jud [judsonvaughn@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 11:17 PM
To: Web Design and Development
Subject: [WD&D] Re: CMS for entire site?
All,
I definitely don't have my mind made up. Just strongly opinionated.
Your arguments are convincing. I prefer to work in raw code without
the "rubber gloves" of helper web-based editors, but I can't argue
with the speed of templating.
I got out of this work for awhile. I guess I need to reconsider.
- chris walker <customsitepro@gmail.com> Oct 21 12:55PM +0800
Jud,
If you don't want to use the wysiwyg editor, in some CMS's you can set the
editor to none and code away. One of the good things about using a CMS is
the fact that you can just install what you need. There is a definite
tradeoff in site load time though due to the calls to the database.
Chris
--
Chris
- chris walker <customsitepro@gmail.com> Oct 21 08:33PM +0800
After the last 4 years of building in Joomla almost exclusively (over 100
sites), I have almost abandoned the whole concept. Some clients have gone
behind me and edited the site themselves and made it look like a site built
with frontpage complete with the silly animated gifs of burning torches,
opening and closing doors, and blinking text. Let's not forget the animated
envelopes for email!
I am switching gears and going back to hand coded sites with the addition of
mobile versions built with Jquery mobile. It is nice to have the CMS in my
toolbox, but I am not actively seeking work using Joomla. I am also teaching
myself to create apps for mobile devices as I believe the mobile web is the
future. With the advent of social networking such as twitter where you have
a limit of 140 characters, people are not so interested in large websites.
With short attention spans, people just want a "sound byte". I am not saying
that a conventional website is obsolete, it just is not the current trend in
my opinion.
Chris
--
Chris
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group sitedesign.
You can post via email.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an empty message.
For more options, visit this group.
You received this because you are subscribed to the "Web Design and Development" group at Google Groups. Messages are prefixed with [WD&D] in the subject. No spam is allowed. Be civil, be professional; try to be helpful & mind your netiquette. All posts are Copyright the original author and the Web Design and Development group. No reproduction of this content is allowed in any electronic or printed form outside the group at Google Groups and the http://www.WDaDg.org website. Any unauthorized use of our copy constitutes illegal Copyright infringement and may well be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Digital Signature: $©"[W|D|&|D]g"|^|!SiteDesign@GG||#%$
To post to this group, email SiteDesign@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, email SiteDesign-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SiteDesign?hl=en
No comments:
Post a Comment